4/8/2023 0 Comments Versions vs smartsvn![]() ![]() For example, in SVN 1.10 there were introduced a couple of experimental features like shelving that were turned upside down in SVN 1.11 and, according to my knowledge are not yet supported by all language bindings. Customers won't understand why there are too frequent new versions without any noticeable new features. > We don't like SVN's new 6-month release cycle because our version naming was mapped to the Subversion naming since ages, but don't want to be forced into a 6-month release cycle by SVN (but prefer 1 release per year). On Thursday, 4 October 2018 14:44:04 UTC+1, SmartSVN Support wrote: when will 1.10 be supported (either in GUI or JavaHL) and how frequently do you plan for SmartSVN to be released following Subversion's move to a six-monthly cycle? the conflict resolver), but should not become a barrier to upgrading the core svn: we already have Eclipse for that :-) It would not have to implement all of the new features, as we are happy to use the command line where necessary (e.g. SmartSVN looks like it might provide the GUI we desire but ideally it would follow the svn releases (which are about to become more frequent). I'd like to suggest to my team that we move away from Eclipse as our primary IDE but people like the GUI browser, so we reverted to 1.9. We would like to upgrade to svn 1.10 but it breaks subclipse (complains about JavaHL 1.9 not being present). ![]() We currently use a combination of svn command line and Eclipse / subclipse. I've joined the group to ask the same question. > Is there any information available on when support for subversion 1.10 will be available in SmartSVN? Thanks! ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |